Stronghold Kingdoms Forums

Voninski is the One.

All Hail the One.

5439

5,122

the impending victory of h9, over h10 will surely dip that number down to about.... whatever membership total h9 has

And it'll stay lowering for sure.
When will it be under 1000?

World 1 population in thousands 9.9
Points of the top 5 houses in millions
34.6
23
16.7
14.9
12.1
_____
World 2 population in thousands 4.3
Points of the top 5 houses in millions
41.2
16.9
8.9
6.6
3.1
_____
World 3 population in thousands 5.6
Points of the top 5 houses in millions
33.3
19.5
12.5
10
8.3
_____
World 4 population in thousands 3.9
Points of the top 5 houses in millions
47
5.5
1.5
1.1
1
_____
World 5 population in thousands 4.8
Points of the top 5 houses in millions
35.3
16.2
13.7
5.8
4.6
_____
World 6 population in thousands 6.2
Points of the top 5 houses in millions
35.4
16.3
7.8
7.7
4.5
_____
World 7 population in thousands 8.4
Points of the top 5 houses in millions
16.4
15.9
14.6
14.3
12.4
_____
World 8 population in thousands 13.9
Points of the top 5 houses in millions
14.4
7.9
6.9
5.9
5.5
_____
USA 1 population in thousands 18.7
Points of the top 5 houses in millions
11.4
6.5
6.0
5.4
4.5

I think that shows that taking out the factor of how old the world is, the population is very much proportional to how competitive it is, or at least looks.

Voninski wrote:Intelligent compilation of data. Well drawn correlation. Accurate conclusion.

Build in a way to stop one house world or your servers will die. With the way the rules are now, makes me wonder if Firefly wants the worlds to die. I wouldn't mind if FF just came out and said "We want an end to the current worlds and to keep bringing in new worlds" but lets have an definitive announcement and let the players know.

I await the inevitable link to this announcement because I never do my homework.

-Von

you're the leader of one of the one house worlds... if you don't like it, have yer H9 disband and W5 will derp around for a little longer.

Voninski wrote:Intelligent compilation of data. Well drawn correlation. Accurate conclusion.

Build in a way to stop one house world or your servers will die. With the way the rules are now, makes me wonder if Firefly wants the worlds to die. I wouldn't mind if FF just came out and said "We want an end to the current worlds and to keep bringing in new worlds" but lets have an definitive announcement and let the players know.

I await the inevitable link to this announcement because I never do my homework.

-Von

I do not think FF intended this, I think they overestimated a players ties to their sovereignty, the land, and other players, and underestimated how much players work in their own self interest. We as players are also content providers for games like this, and when our own self interest is not in line with what makes us good content providers for the game, the game suffers.

Voninski wrote:Super, I am winning the game that I play. I am hoping that FF will change the game so it is challenging. IF they don't...everyone that is not on my team should quit because I intend to keep winning. If FF reduced my house size to 4 faction (6 at the most), it would force the house to split and there would be war between the stronger factions once again.

I am not going to change the rules for myself if others do not have to play by them.

I am going to get in trouble for calling it "my" house so we might see a rebellion...woot!

-Von

I commend your honestly, most players jump through hoops, use Alinsky tactics, and make a wide range of contradictory arguments, to justify what they are doing in your position.