The Final Age

[Wilksy]

The most critical part of the game will be the days( more likely hours) at the end of the 6th age and prior to the final age rollover. I personally am going to go on a crusade to raze out as many 1 village players as possible in that limited time frame.

Why? Anyone who ever possessed a village on that world before the start of the Final Age (be it Day 1 of the world) may enter it in the Final Age.

Are you saying that any player that has ever had a village on UK-4 will be able to join the game in the Final Age of UK-4?

For example, though I have not played on UK-3 in several years, when the Final Age of UK-3 server starts 5 years from now I will be able to enter that Final Age?

I think he's saying that yes. I read it as ANY player who has a village prior to the Final Age commencing can join the Final Age.

[Wilksy]

I think it is stupid to have final victory whats the point of playing a game when you know the games going to come to an end and you have to restart from scratch if u want to keep playing other worlds should firefly decide to make new worlds

The alternative is many worlds with few players doing nothing...

[Popeye25]

The Final Age!

The Final Age brings with it a new rule set:



1. The Final Age begins with 150 Royal Towers on the map.
2. ‘The Button’ can be pressed by the Marshall of the House that controls all towers.
3. Pressing ‘The Button’ ends the world, determining which players claim each reward tier!
4. The Glory Race has no end and Houses are no longer eliminated.
5. The first House to reach 1 million Glory points wins the Round and gains a star.
6. After each Glory Round, towers respawn and tower control is reset.
7. Each Round brings the number of towers down by 10, with a minimum of 20.
8. A new ‘Royal Towers’ tab has been added to the Glory screen.
9. Capital guilds can now be upgraded an additional five levels.
10. No new players may join this game world. Only those who previously had a village on this world may enter it.

Firefly please get of your lazy * think of some good content instead of throwing a load of * this is the crappiest update you have ever done.
we don't spend money on this game for you to give up lazy updates we just worked 1 and half years to end age 5 and you spent 1 day grabbing random * from other servers and doing an end of server which no one wants.

hold off on this stupid update and come up with real game rules if this is what you planning to use delete my account

[Klaire]

It would be simple for a small group of players to prevent the 'end of the world'
all you'd need is one tower to NOT be controlled by the dominating house.

[Popeye25]

It would be simple for a small group of players to prevent the 'end of the world'
all you'd need is one tower to NOT be controlled by the dominating house.

that may be true but what about all the other bullshi* same * as last age just half the house size.
Firefly has wasted our time and can shove this game.

Seriously lazy update today players have spent a year and a half doing this for a days work from firefly LAZY is not the word.

[Popeye25]

that may be true but what about all the other bullshi* same * as last age just half the house size.
Firefly has wasted our time and can shove this game.

Seriously lazy update today players have spent a year and a half doing this for a days work from firefly LAZY is not the word.

What did you expect the endgame to be?

Well they did a poll asking about it and the majority voted against it.
firefly need to start doing better updates or they will lose their players slowly seen it happen to even better games then this when they don't listen to what people want.

Its not my job to think of content its there's and just by copy and pasting crap from others servers and reverting changes made in other ages does not count as an updates its more of a downgrade with random useless *

[DekeYoungAtlanta]

Well they did a poll asking about it and the majority voted against it.

69 for 111 against and 14 not sure was technically a majority, but in the bigger picture only 194 people responded to the survey. As time when on the percentages for those opposed declined. I also did some analysis and found that more of the votes against were cast by players that are not active on UK-1 or UK-4.

The forum interface is limited. If it were my company I would have indexed the votes cast against factors for 5th age activity and crowns purchased.

Players have been leaving the game regardless. I do not see the publication of 6th/Final age rules as increasing the attrition rate. I personally project that if Firefly had not announced an end game that more players would leave UK-1 and UK-4 due to boredom then the vocal few that claim to leave do to dissatisfaction with the changes.

[Juris931]

people like to complain , this is a fact
when someone does a job there are always 100 who say they can do it better

forme this final age is a great way to prevent that ,on an active server, players start war of monks, with millions of points faith
victory is independent from parishes that an house can own with interdiction and influence, but can only be achieved with captains
I think it's good, a shake to the game mechanics that so often have been criticized

true that a group can prevent the victory, but in the long run will remain always less towers .... risk is that a group of players come back to steal the final prizes
20 towers = 20 timed capture or villages close to towers and when all sleep capture and close the server


ps: if you like so much play on standard server and kill ia castle go play on wolf , at least u will gain cards xD

[Lord Darko900]

Well they did a poll asking about it and the majority voted against it.

I also did some analysis and found that more of the votes against were cast by players that are not active on UK-1 or UK-4.
.

The poll wasn't exclusive to UK-1 or UK-4 as far as i'm aware of it

They did a poll ..the majority of people who voted in the poll were against ending worlds yet firefly has announced a final age !!

what i don't understand is people were always able to play multiple worlds ..if someone likes to play a new world they play it if not then they won't play it ..closing their main world won't suddenly make them want to play a new world if they don't want to ..i don't get it why someone wants a world closed if they are not playing on the world ? there are other people who play those worlds

and honestly if you are not actively playing one of those old worlds then i don't think you should worry/care about them being closed or not or keep bit**ching about only 100 or less people are active ..i don't see any problem with that as long as the world ( those 100 or less players ) make enough money for firefly to keep the server online and profit from it which actually firefly has said those old worlds still make enough money for them ...

[hylanda]

true that a group can prevent the victory, but in the long run will remain always less towers .... risk is that a group of players come back to steal the final prizes20 towers = 20 timed capture or villages close to towers and when all sleep capture and close the server

Yep. Everybody knows the mayhem that ensues when a new age starts (or the fiasco when a server is rolled backed *ahem*) as it gives an opportunity for players to get the jump on all the rest who have yet to come online.

So no doubt there will be players setting up specialist teams to take down these old worlds. And not for the reward of a card pack or two but for the deviant satisfaction of p*ssing off a player base who never signed up for this in the first place.

How do we know that this won't end up being the griefers' ultimate wet dream?...