Where should the GC report go from here?

All discussion related to activity in the Global Conflict world should be posted here.
Post Reply
User avatar
DavidSpy
Posts: 7163
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 1:08 am
Location: WI, USA
Contact:

Where should the GC report go from here?

Post by DavidSpy » Sun Apr 17, 2016 6:15 am

This is an issue I always new would crop up, new worlds opening and old worlds dying off, but I had hoped I'd have a bit more time to consider different ideas about how to go about adjusting to it. It's simply not possible for me at the moment to knowledgeably cover the full breadth of politics in two worlds, I'd be spreading myself too thinly, so I'm interested in hearing some of your suggestions about what you'd like to see the GC1 weekly briefing become in the next week or so.
Questions? You should join my Discord group
Helpful SHK Sites: SHK Advanced Guide | SHK Strategy
Check out my Stronghold Kingdoms tutorials on YouTube | RazingHell

ImageImage

Alopexdog
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 8:35 pm

Re: Where should the GC report go from here?

Post by Alopexdog » Sun Apr 17, 2016 12:23 pm

I think you should stick with GC1. There doesn't seem to be much happening on GC2.

User avatar
Lord Darko900
Posts: 962
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 5:19 am

Re: Where should the GC report go from here?

Post by Lord Darko900 » Sun Apr 17, 2016 3:07 pm

Stick with GC1
Yoooooooooo

RobertScott
Posts: 310
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 6:42 am
Location: Massachusetts USA

Re: Where should the GC report go from here?

Post by RobertScott » Sun Apr 17, 2016 3:21 pm

Please stay here. GC 2 is going to peak early with low population and bleed out anyway.

RobertScott
Posts: 310
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 6:42 am
Location: Massachusetts USA

Re: Where should the GC report go from here?

Post by RobertScott » Tue Apr 19, 2016 9:46 am

Responding to another question you asked in the video, you can dispense with that county by county flip rc
recitation, not only does it take you a long time to homework up, but folks should be able to see that themselves anyway. Moreover, sorry to say buddy, I have been turning the videos off once you finish the overall analysis and start reading this list.

It is the same for folks who asked you to go over House points, why, that is easily seen for yourself.

I suppose this would free up more than enough time to cover both GC 1 and 2, but GC2 is just a grand mistake on FF's part and should just be ignored and left to wither.

Your interview proposal would be fantastic if it could be implemented but again without some noticeable incentive to do it, and keeping in mind the language barrier, it is just not feasible.

I say again I wish you had more sources which is why FF would have to internally incentivize it . I was not clear on is H 2 still fighting 19 or not, or what is going on with H 9 in Canada.

User avatar
DavidSpy
Posts: 7163
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 1:08 am
Location: WI, USA
Contact:

Re: Where should the GC report go from here?

Post by DavidSpy » Sat Apr 23, 2016 6:00 pm

Yeah, right now, based on last week's feedback, I'm thinking I'll be dropping both land changes and house points coverage but branching out into GC2 and covering only the big events in both worlds.
Questions? You should join my Discord group
Helpful SHK Sites: SHK Advanced Guide | SHK Strategy
Check out my Stronghold Kingdoms tutorials on YouTube | RazingHell

ImageImage

meatball2k
Posts: 2258
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2012 11:13 am

Re: Where should the GC report go from here?

Post by meatball2k » Sat Apr 23, 2016 6:54 pm

It would be nice to see lots of small houses fighting over a couple fo country's in gc2. Hopefully you get to report on that rather then 1 alliance vs the next alliance for world server domination on day 50.
Image

chaser9
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue May 06, 2014 1:38 pm

Re: Where should the GC report go from here?

Post by chaser9 » Sun Apr 24, 2016 1:28 am

Would it be easier to do GC1 and 2 bi-weekly, obviously alternating weeks

Post Reply

Return to “Global Conflict Lounge”